Supreme Court denies RFK Jr.’s bid to be reinstated to New York ballot

Washington — The Supreme Court on Friday rejected a bid by independent presidential Robert F. Kennedy Jr. to restore his name to New York’s general election ballot.
The unsigned order from the court leaves intact a lower court decision declining to place his name back on New York’s ballot ahead of the Nov. 5 contest. Kennedy mounted an unsuccessful independent bid for the White House and, after suspending his campaign last month, is working to have his name removed from ballots in more than a dozen states.
He has since endorsed former President Donald Trump, the Republican nominee.
Kennedy asked the high court in an emergency appeal this week to reinstate his name in the Empire State, arguing that his supporters “have a constitutional right to have Kennedy placed on the ballot — and to vote for him, whether he is campaigning for their vote or not.” 
“Whatever inconvenience the [state] may have in adding Kennedy to the ballot seven weeks before the election, it seems inconceivable that those difficulties or expenses could outweigh the constitutional rights of 108,417 New York voters,” his campaign told the court in its request for emergency relief.
The dispute arose after Kennedy collected more than 120,000 signatures to appear on New York’s ballot. The signatures were submitted to the state elections board in May, which went on to certify their validity and vote to place Kennedy on the ballot.
But several individuals filed a lawsuit in state court challenging Kennedy’s nominating petition. A state court and appeals court both ordered the board to keep Kennedy off the ballot on the grounds that his nominating petition listed an invalid address for the presidential hopeful. State law requires a nominating petition to show the candidates “place of residence” which is defined as their “fixed, permanent and principal home.”
The address in Katonah, New York, that Kennedy listed on his petition belongs to a friend, whom he paid $500 a month beginning in May for a room that he and the friend both say he has stayed in just once. 
Kennedy said in a sworn declaration filed with a federal court in New York that he is registered to vote in the state and “for consistency purposes” was advised by his election law counsel to use the Katonah address on the nominating petition and other state petitions requiring a residence.
But the state appeals court concluded that the Katonah address wasn’t Kennedy’s “fixed” or “permanent” home, and determined he never lived there. New York’s top court, the Court of Appeals, declined to review the lower court’s decision.
While the state court proceedings were underway, Kennedy’s campaign challenged his exclusion from New York’s ballot in federal court, claiming the state’s residence requirement is unconstitutional. A district judge and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 2nd Circuit, however, declined the campaign’s request to restore Kennedy to the ballot.
The Board of Elections issued a certification of New York’s general election ballot on Sept. 11 that omitted Kennedy from it.
Kennedy, the son of the late Robert F. Kennedy and nephew of John F. Kennedy, argued in a filing with the Supreme Court that the address on his nominating petition is “entirely immaterial” to voters and to New York, and said the residence requirement is not related to a qualification to run for the presidency.
His campaign also argued that disclosing a “controversial” public figure’s home address puts him and his family at risk.
“It can result in round-the-clock demonstrations outside his house, attacks on his home, and harassment of his family, including his children,” Kennedy’s campaign argued. “This is a severe burden to impose on a presidential candidate on pain of exclusion from the ballot.”
The Board of Elections urged the Supreme Court to reject Kennedy’s request, noting that not only has the ballot certification deadline already passed, but so has a federal deadline for mailing ballots to overseas and military voters, which was Sept. 21.
“The requested injunction would not only severely disrupt the state’s election processes and trigger substantial voter confusion, but also cause New York to miss federal deadlines for mailing overseas and military ballots and potentially disenfranchise voters who receive and vote the original ballot,” state officials wrote in a Supreme Court filing.
They also noted that Kennedy has already called off his own presidential campaign, endorsed Trump and is in court in other states to remove his name from their ballots.
“Kennedy’s purported concern for his petition signers’ rights is highly questionable given his attempts to remove his name from the ballots in other states,” New York officials said. “Meanwhile, voters who may not be aware of Kennedy’s suspension of his candidacy may be misled by his presence on the ballot into thinking that he remains a bona fide candidate for the presidency.”
Kennedy’s suspension of his campaign came after months of fighting to get on the ballot in every state and Washington, D.C. At the time, he said he would seek to have his name removed from the ballots in 10 states that his campaign considered competitive because it risked harming Trump’s chances of winning the election against Vice President Kamala Harris. He also endorsed Trump, but said his supporters should still vote for him in states where it would not be to the detriment of the Republican nominee. 
But Kennedy later encouraged his supporters in every state to vote for Trump and has sought to remove his name from the ballot in more states than the original 10. According to CBS News’ latest tally, Kennedy’s name won’t appear on the ballot in 18 states. 
His campaign website now declares “a vote for Trump is a vote for Kennedy.”
In August, a Georgia judge determined Kennedy was “not qualified” to appear on the state’s ballot, citing questions about his New York residency. Georgia was one of the 10 states where Kennedy wanted his name removed from the ballot and he did not challenge the decision.
While he fights to have his name reinstated in New York, he’s waging a separate battle in Michigan to have his name removed. The Michigan Supreme Court ruled in September to keep him on the ballot. He has appealed to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 6th Circuit.  
Kennedy’s request for relief is the third involving the 2024 election to land before the Supreme Court, though more are expected. The justices in August revived part of an Arizona law requiring documentary proof of citizenship when registering to vote using a state-created form, but declined to allow enforcement of provisions mandating such proof in order to vote for president or by mail.
Earlier this month, it rejected a bid to put Green Party presidential candidate Jill Stein on the Nevada general election ballot.